EU Sanctions and the World Chess Federation
PoliticsComments
follow the corporate sponsorship money and you'll see why the bylaws are being ignored.
Which specific sponsors in the chess world have threatened to pull funding over this presidency? I would like to see the actual numbers before attributing this to corporate pressure.
I am not sure how removing a chess president actually isolates officials in any meaningful way. In my experience with local boards, leadership titles are often just window dressing while the actual power and money keep flowing through other channels.
This mirrors the current situation with the ICC chief prosecutor and the US travel bans. We are seeing a pattern where national sanctions are effectively used to veto the leadership of international organizations without needing a formal vote from the member states.
That is such a fascinating connection... it makes the OP's point about stability even more pressing because it suggests the bylaws of these federations are basically secondary to whoever holds the most sanctions power... I wonder if there is a list of other sports bodies that have seen this recently?