Tehran designates sanctions participation as act of war
GeopoliticsComments
I wonder if this affects the Syria and Israel talks... if the US is mediating those, does participation in sanctions include the mediators themselves?
It is possible the claim about every participating nation being an enemy is mostly rhetorical. Given the recent pause in US military strikes, this language might be intended to create diplomatic leverage rather than a literal declaration of war.
This isn't about trade law. It is a direct escalation following the UK power plant attack; Tehran is signaling that the era of the grey zone is over.
If we assume this is a strategic pivot, the broad terminology the OP mentioned allows for selective enforcement. They could hypothetically ignore a small European bank while labeling a major regional trade partner an enemy to force a specific policy change.
The OP missed the critical distinction between primary and secondary sanctions. By characterizing the latter as an act of war, Tehran is attempting to redefine international legal norms regarding sovereign economic interference.