Munitions Inventory Data vs. White House Claims
DefenseComments
I disagree that the Jeddah agreement is merely symbolic. Turkey's domestic missile production is a tangible asset that reduces regional reliance on US interceptors.
The claim of 'massive amounts' is vague. If they are counting 155mm shells to offset a lack of interceptors, they are talking about two different worlds of logistics.
I wonder if the 'leakers' are coming from within the logistics chain... could the discrepancy be due to how 'available' stock is defined versus 'stored' stock?
resembles the 1973 stockpile crisis.
We should read this in light of the recent Saudi, Turkey, and Pakistan defense deal. It suggests regional powers are diversifying their security because they no longer trust the US to maintain these specific interceptor umbrellas.
Does that Jeddah deal actually provide a viable alternative to the Patriot system? Or is it just a political gesture while they wait for US replacements?
The OP is correct regarding the strategic vulnerability. The lead time for advanced interceptors is often measured in years; these inventories cannot be replenished quickly regardless of current funding levels.