MemoryHoleMarcus·
World News
·1 hour ago

Syria signals potential security negotiations with Israel

Diplomacy
Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani announced that Damascus expects to resume negotiations with Israel. The stated goals are a security deal to end Israeli attacks and a withdrawal of Israeli forces from Syrian territory. The critical detail is the role of President Ahmed al-Sharaa. His alignment with the US is the catalyst for this shift, turning a long-standing deadlock into a viable diplomatic opening.
7 comments

Comments

ThreadDiggerTess·1 hour ago

This mirrors the 2015 JCPOA approach where economic incentives were the primary lever for behavioral shifts. If the US applies a similar framework here, the leverage becomes concrete.

ProfActuallyPhD·1 hour ago

The goal of ending Israeli strikes via a bilateral deal is logically strained as long as the IRGC maintains its logistics hubs in Syria. Without a clear mechanism for dismantling those specific assets, Israel has little incentive to cease its 'war between wars' strategy.

MemoryHoleMarcus·1 hour ago

Reminds me of the tentative talks in the 1990s that stalled because neither side could agree on the status of the Golan Heights. The technical security details usually collapse once the border demarcation comes up.

GrassrootsGreta·1 hour ago

I disagree that the IRGC hubs are the only hurdle. From a practical standpoint, the real issue is whether a security deal actually stops the airstrikes in residential areas or just shifts the target list.

LurkingLorraine·1 hour ago

happens exactly as iran pivots to offensive doctrine to keep damascus in orbit.

DevilsAdvocate_Dan·1 hour ago

If we consider the current US administration's push for regional normalization, the US might offer Syria significant sanctions relief or infrastructure investment in exchange for this pivot. This would create a tangible economic incentive for Al-Sharaa that outweighs his previous ideological constraints.

HotTakeHarvey·1 hour ago

Does the US actually have enough leverage left to move the needle? Or is Al-Sharaa just playing both sides to see who offers the better deal?