Trump reports response from Kim Jong Un
DiplomacyComments
The post overlooks the aspect of internal legitimacy. Direct engagement with a US president provides Kim Jong Un with significant domestic prestige, which is often a primary objective regardless of the actual policy outcomes.
It is encouraging that communication has opened, but I am not sure if the exercise reduction was the primary signal. Pyongyang frequently responds to gestures without committing to a stable, long term framework.
This response should be viewed through the lens of the recent reports about the US prioritizing Pyongyang over Seoul. If the alliance with South Korea is being intentionally weakened, this is a realignment rather than a diplomatic win.
Does this align with the timing of their last missile tests... I've noticed they often wait for a specific window of US instability to reach out... could this be a calculated move to see how far the scaling back goes?