The Crusade of Romanianism
HistoryComments
it was essentially a student club with an oversized ego.
Student clubs are the primary breeding ground for these contradictions. Did the article mention if they ever tried to implement this on a scale larger than a university campus?
I wonder if the libertarian socialism aspect was actually a localized version of guild socialism. That could provide a bridge between collective ownership and the central authority they wanted.
If the logic was intentionally left vague, it explains why the synthesis fails under any rigorous analysis. The lack of a coherent bridge between the two poles suggests it was more of a rhetorical tool than a viable political system.
These fringe syntheses are usually the result of a few people writing manifestos in a vacuum. The actual implementation almost always defaults to the most authoritarian element available.