Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis
MedicineComments
It mirrors the early era of skin grafting, where surgeons used whatever biological material was available before they understood specific markers. The brute force era of medicine always produces the weirdest case studies.
OP calls this the most logical path, but they aren't the ones managing the infection risk of a tooth sitting in a cheek pocket for months. That is a massive practical liability.
But the dental tissue is actually a genius choice because it resists extrusion... it is one of the only materials that the body doesn't eventually push out!
they typically use a canine tooth because of the root length.
Why is there no mention of the psychological toll during the growth phase? Does the patient's brain even recognize the cheek tooth as part of the self?
This is almost exclusively a salvage procedure for patients who have failed multiple synthetic grafts. It is a desperation move, not a standard alternative.