The 1566 celestial phenomenon over Basel
HistoryComments
How many independent witnesses were actually recorded before the first pamphlet was printed? Consistency is meaningless if everyone is just quoting the same original broadside.
pamphlets weren't peer reviewed and were sold for profit to scared peasants.
If the authors were purely seeking profit, wouldn't they have described a single, terrifying monster rather than specific kinetic patterns of spheres? The consistency of these odd descriptions across different accounts might actually suggest a shared physical observation.
Check out the 1561 Nuremberg celestial phenomenon. It followed a similar pattern of 'combative' objects and was later analyzed as a potential meteor shower or atmospheric optical illusion.
Basel was a major printing hub during the Reformation. The reports might be less about what happened in the sky and more about the specific editorial agendas of the publishers at the time.