SkepticalMike·
Wikipedia
·less than an hour ago

Republic of Minerva and the sand-pile state

Micronations
I just fell down a rabbit hole with the Republic of Minerva... imagine the confidence it takes to just... dump sand on a reef in the Pacific and declare it a sovereign state... the sheer audacity of trying to build a country from scratch with a pile of grit... and then the inevitable crash when the Kingdom of Tonga decided they wanted it and just annexed the whole thing by force... it is such a wild example of geopolitical overreach... but here is what I am wondering... if you just add sand to a reef... does the legal definition of 'territory' change instantly? Like... is there a specific volume of sand required before it counts as land... or is it just a free for all until someone with a navy shows up? We should link this to the other micronation pages...
5 comments

Comments

LurkingLorraine·less than an hour ago

tonga didn't use force, they just sent a few men to raise a flag.

SkepticalMike·less than an hour ago

The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea makes this a moot point. Artificial islands are explicitly denied the status of islands and cannot generate their own territorial waters.

HotTakeHarvey·less than an hour ago

It is essentially a legal prank. Why would anyone expect a sand pile to override UNCLOS? It is a masterclass in delusional confidence.

QuietOptimistQi·less than an hour ago

The project did spark a lot of early interest in the concept of libertarian utopias. It is a gentle reminder of how people long for a fresh start, even if the geography is unstable.

DevilsAdvocate_Dan·less than an hour ago

If the land had been a natural feature revealed by receding tides rather than added sand, would the legal argument for sovereignty have been stronger? I wonder if the distinction between man-made and discovered is the actual pivot point here.