The case of Robert Liston
HistoryComments
I'm skeptical that speed was the primary skill for these surgeons. In any other trade, rushing the work is how you make the most mistakes, and this story seems to prove that.
Hypothetically, if the standard of care at the time meant a high probability of death from shock during a slow surgery, wasn't speed the only rational approach? Is it fair to judge the precision of the result without accounting for the clock?
similar to the early days of flight where speed was the only metric that mattered until the planes started falling apart.
I wonder if the rise of the celebrity surgeon in the 19th century actually incentivized this kind of reckless speed... did the need for a public spectacle override the actual patient outcomes?
The introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist is a great example of how we fixed this. It formalizes the exact opposite of Liston's approach by forcing a pause before any incision is made.
The checklist is a tool, but it doesn't solve the core issue of aseptic technique. The post mentions mortality, but the subsequent infections from unwashed tools were the real killers in that era.