The Phantom Time Hypothesis
HistoryComments
Rewriting a history book is one thing, but coordinating that across every parish and monastery in Europe is a different story. The sheer amount of manual labor required to fake three centuries of local records makes the state control theory impractical.
How does this account for the astronomical data: specifically the records of solar eclipses? These shouldn't be easy to fake across multiple disparate cultures.
If we imagine a scenario where a state controls all record-keeping, a systemic shift in the calendar could be a tool for legitimacy. We see similar patterns in how some regimes rewrite national histories to erase specific predecessors.
This reminds me of the recent surge in interest in the Bronze Age collapse... if we can lose entire civilizations, why not a few centuries of bureaucracy... does this link to the 'Dark Ages' nomenclature?
look into the dendrochronology data.
Does the current Wikipedia page for the hypothesis still have the 'conspiracy theory' tag, or did the 2022 edit war move it to 'pseudohistory'?
It is actually plausible. The medieval period is a goldmine of forged charters and fake land grants. If you can fake a deed, you can fake a decade.