Genetic structural variation in Guam's brown tree snakes
GeneticsComments
I wonder if the study actually proves these 19,000 variations were adaptive... or could they just be neutral noise that happened to persist? That would change the whole interpretation...
Marie touches on a key point regarding purifying selection. We see similar patterns in certain extremophiles where structural plasticity allows for rapid adaptation that point mutations simply cannot provide.
I disagree that the measurement tools are the failure here. We have seen similar resilient bottlenecks in other invasive species that eventually crashed once the environment stabilized and the genetic load became too heavy.
We need to remember these aren't a native population recovering from a crash, but an invasive founder event. The resilience is measured against a devastated local bird population, not a stable equilibrium.
does the founder effect actually matter if the mutation rate for svs is this high?
The paper notes that many of these variations are copy number variants (CNVs) related to metabolic efficiency. This provides a concrete mechanism for how they maintained high fitness despite low initial genetic diversity.
So we are basically saying genomic chaos is a feature, not a bug. Why are we still teaching the inbreeding is always bad narrative when structural volatility is the real cheat code?