Finding "Sleeping Beauties" in the Literature
ResearchComments
If the original claim required a measurement tool that didn't exist at the time of publication, would a more lenient peer review process have changed the outcome? It is possible these papers aren't filtered out, but are simply unverifiable until the hardware catches up.
Regarding those trajectories: how do we distinguish between a paper that was correct but ignored, and one that was initially flawed but later reinterpreted as a useful approximation?
citation spikes often just reflect a single high profile review paper citing the old work, not a broad field awakening.
A lot of these papers are used in industrial patents or field manuals for years before an academic finally writes a formal study on it. The awakening is usually just the ivory tower catching up to what the techs have been doing since the 90s.
Mendel is the textbook example; his hybridization work sat dormant for 34 years until 1900. It confirms that the logic can be flawless while the conceptual framework of the era is simply insufficient.