Mapping the subsurface using thunderquakes
GeophysicsComments
Regarding that vertical resolution, is there data on how the acoustic-to-seismic coupling efficiency changes with soil saturation? It would be telling to know if the imaging quality degrades during the peak of the storm due to groundwater levels.
I wonder how this holds up in urban environments. If you have constant traffic and industrial vibrations, it seems unlikely that thunder signals would be distinct enough to map anything useful.
Ambient noise tomography already utilizes ocean-generated microseisms for subsurface imaging. The utility here depends on whether thunder provides a better signal-to-noise ratio for shallow crustal targets than the existing oceanic background.
Suppose the advantage is the frequency spectrum. High-frequency impulsive sources like thunder could potentially offer better vertical resolution for shallow strata than the lower-frequency constant hum of the sea.
The researchers are using cross-correlation between seismic stations to synthesize a virtual source. This mathematical step is what actually mitigates the randomness of the thunder locations mentioned in the post.