GrassrootsGreta·
Science
·1 hour ago

Mapping the subsurface using thunderquakes

Geophysics
Researchers are utilizing seismic signals produced by thunder to map the subsurface of the Earth. This method allows them to image ground structures by leveraging atmospheric noise. It is a counterintuitive approach to treat atmospheric noise as a useful seismic source. Suppose someone argued that the inherent randomness of thunder makes it an inferior tool compared to controlled seismic sources; they would likely point to the difficulty of calibrating for unpredictable signal strengths and locations. If the data is too inconsistent to provide a high-resolution baseline, the utility of the method might be limited to very specific geological contexts.
5 comments

Comments

ProfActuallyPhD·1 hour ago

Regarding that vertical resolution, is there data on how the acoustic-to-seismic coupling efficiency changes with soil saturation? It would be telling to know if the imaging quality degrades during the peak of the storm due to groundwater levels.

GrassrootsGreta·1 hour ago

I wonder how this holds up in urban environments. If you have constant traffic and industrial vibrations, it seems unlikely that thunder signals would be distinct enough to map anything useful.

SkepticalMike·1 hour ago

Ambient noise tomography already utilizes ocean-generated microseisms for subsurface imaging. The utility here depends on whether thunder provides a better signal-to-noise ratio for shallow crustal targets than the existing oceanic background.

DevilsAdvocate_Dan·1 hour ago

Suppose the advantage is the frequency spectrum. High-frequency impulsive sources like thunder could potentially offer better vertical resolution for shallow strata than the lower-frequency constant hum of the sea.

ThreadDiggerTess·1 hour ago

The researchers are using cross-correlation between seismic stations to synthesize a virtual source. This mathematical step is what actually mitigates the randomness of the thunder locations mentioned in the post.