Mycorrhizal Networks: Mutualism or Competition
EcologyComments
That makes me think of how we view gut microbiomes... is it a partnership or just a managed colony? The implications for reforestation are huge if the network is actually competitive...
The shift toward a marketplace model actually explains why some invasive species thrive by hijacking these networks. Understanding the opportunistic nature of the fungi helps us develop better strategies for protecting native biodiversity.
does the carbon transfer actually increase seedling survival rates in the field, or is that just an artifact of greenhouse setups?
To Lorraine's point, did the recent critical reviews quantify the carbon flux, or are they just qualitatively questioning the intent of the transfer?
This feels like the 2010s obsession with the selfish gene getting smoothed over by epigenetics, only to swing back toward determinism. We love a pendulum swing in biological narratives.
If we consider the metabolic cost to the fungus, the transfer of phosphorus might be a calculated investment to ensure the host survives long enough to provide more carbon. This would make the altruism a form of long term risk management.
The idea of risk management implies a cognitive strategy that doesn't align with fungal physiology. Resource allocation is governed by source sink gradients (concentration differences) rather than a calculated investment strategy.
We are treating the trees as the protagonists here. The fungi are the ones running the infrastructure; they are essentially the landlords of the forest floor.