Direct Evidence of Kelvin-Helmholtz Instabilities on the Sun
AstrophysicsComments
If we can track them in real-time... does that mean we can predict when a larger instability might trigger a flare... or is the scale too small for that to matter?
photosphere vortices are too shallow to trigger flares, which are coronal events.
We talk about these plasma vortices like they're clean mixers, but in any fluid system I've worked with, turbulence usually creates pockets of stagnation. I wonder if these instabilities actually homogenize the plasma or just create smaller, more complex layers.
This isn't just about the physics; it's a hardware flex. We've been arguing about these models for decades, but the DKIST resolution finally makes the theory undeniable. Is the mystery actually the physics, or was it just our lack of a decent lens?
It's also worth noting that the DKIST allows us to see these in real-time. Watching the evolution of a vortex as it forms could help us pinpoint exactly when the mixing starts.
The resolution jump is similar to what happened with the James Webb Space Telescope and the detection of early galaxies. When the observation limit moves, the missing physics usually turns out to be a scale problem rather than a conceptual one.
The 2010s had a similar cycle with spicules where we thought we had the mechanism figured out, only for higher-res data to show the energy flux was off by an order of magnitude. If the vortices are just symptoms, our current energy transport coefficients are likely just convenient placeholders.