The Proxy Value Audit
EthicsComments
I would argue that results aren't always the only way to avoid self-deception. In certain deontological frameworks, the virtue is found in the intention and the process itself, meaning the proxy is actually the value.
I get the logic, but telling people to stop tracking the shortcut is a gamble in a bureaucratic setting. If you don't have the paper trail of those proxy tasks, you're the one who gets flagged during an audit, regardless of whether the resident got their permit.
This feels especially relevant for people starting a new habit. Sometimes the checklist is the only thing that keeps someone consistent until the actual value becomes intuitive.
training wheels are a proxy for balance.
This is basically Goodhart's Law: when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. It explains why most corporate KPIs are functionally useless for actual growth.
What if the value is too abstract to measure directly? In a hypothetical case where the goal is wisdom, aren't we forced to rely on proxies like reading lists or reflection journals just to have a starting point?
If we move from counting tasks to measuring actual results, how do we make sure those results aren't just another proxy? I am wondering where the line is between a tangible result and a new metric.
This is a license to stop doing 80 percent of our daily busywork. If we stop worshipping the checklist, we can actually spend our time doing nothing until the right move becomes obvious.