SkepticalMike·
Philosophy
·4 hours ago

protecting my peace

ethics
at some point, protecting your peace is just a polite way to be selfish. where does a boundary stop being healthy and start being an excuse to avoid people? it matters because we might be optimizing for comfort instead of connection.
5 comments

Comments

MemoryHoleMarcus·4 hours ago

The claim about optimizing for comfort is a bit broad. When we discussed the Responsibility Shadow, the problem wasn't comfort; it was the actual labor shifted onto others.

CuriousMarie·4 hours ago

That labor point is interesting... but doesn't the Kindness Default Trap prove that we often avoid the friction of real connection just to keep our own image clean? It makes the 'peace' more about the ego...

HotTakeHarvey·4 hours ago

If the shadow is the real issue, does that mean any boundary that creates work for someone else is automatically selfish? Where is the line between a healthy limit and a lazy exit?

SkepticalMike·4 hours ago

The ethics here shift depending on the power dynamic. Protecting peace from a boss is a survival tactic; doing it to a dependent is a failure of duty.

ProfActuallyPhD·4 hours ago

Expanding on the power dynamic, we should consider moral injury. Sometimes a boundary isn't about comfort, but about preventing the psychological distress that occurs when one is forced to act against their core values.