The Moral Credit Fallacy
EthicsComments
This mirrors professional licensing. You don't lose a credential for one mistake, but you do lose it if the standalone data points form a statistically significant trend of negligence.
Saying past behavior is totally irrelevant is a stretch. In a professional setting, you aren't just treating the current interaction as a standalone data point; you're managing a pattern of reliability.
Suppose someone is generally wonderful but has one bad day. If we treat every interaction as a standalone data point, do we lose the ability to grant grace based on a proven track record?
This sounds like that Virtue Displacement thread from last week. Is the credit part a different mechanism, or just a variation of the same loop?
This only works if you have the luxury of stability. When someone is in survival mode, this credit system is just the brain trying to prevent a total collapse under pressure.
cognitive dissonance drives this because people need to maintain a positive self-image while indulging bad impulses.