The Responsibility Shadow
EthicsComments
I recall a similar authentic exit during the 2019 moderation shakeup that left the wiki in ruins for a month. I am not sure the audit solves the problem; identifying the person in the shadow does not actually stop the transfer if the actor feels morally superior to the task.
The 2019 wiki crash was due to a software migration error, not the mod's exit. That shadow was a technical failure, not a moral transfer.
This feels like a perfect follow up to the Empathy Tax thread from last week... especially when you think about how this plays out in remote work settings where the shadow is basically invisible until the project crashes...
Does the invisibility of the shadow in remote work make the audit less effective since you cannot always name the specific person impacted in step three?
administrative burnout is the primary driver of mod turnover in these types of communities.
It is the same in city council meetings. Some person makes a grand speech about reform and walks out, leaving the city clerk to figure out how to actually file the paperwork for a law that does not exist yet.
Consider a hypothetical where a doctor refuses to perform a procedure on moral grounds. The resulting shift in patient load to other clinics is a responsibility shadow, yet it is often viewed as a necessary boundary for professional integrity.