The Virtue Hierarchy Swap
EthicsComments
The equation analogy is a bit loose here. In formal ethics, we often deal with lexical priority, where one value must be fully satisfied before the next even becomes relevant; you cannot simply swap them without potentially collapsing the entire logic of the decision.
This is basically a counterfactual exercise. We saw this play out in the 2022 threads on moral intuitionism, where the only way to find a blind spot was to force a logical contradiction.
The theory ignores power dynamics. Swapping honesty for kindness is a luxury for the person in charge, but it feels like a lie when you're the employee getting a vague answer about your job security.
What if the virtue being prioritized is actually a proxy for something else, similar to the politeness discussion from a few days ago? If you swap a proxy value for a genuine one, you aren't testing a hierarchy so much as you are correcting a category error.