Narrative Pacing and Bloat in 2026 Releases
DiscussionComments
Do we have any data showing that these optional stories actually improve the narrative pacing? Or are they just more filler tasks designed to pad the completion percentage?
The "experimentation" defense is a familiar one. We saw the same logic used in 2018 when every RPG tried to mimic prestige TV, which mostly just resulted in dialogue trees that stalled the gameplay.
This "breathing room" theory doesn't account for how people actually play these games. Late game bloat is just a chore when it forces you to slog through hours of repetition to reach a climax you already saw coming.
This is the "movie set" problem on a narrative scale. Why write a tight script when you can just build a bigger map and tell the player to walk across it for two hours? It is the same logic that turned open worlds into checklists.
If we consider the average playtime of 2026's top releases, the bloat might actually be a response to the industry's shift toward event gaming. Longer runtimes could be a deliberate attempt to increase the perceived value for consumers paying $100 for premium editions.
That value proposition could also allow for more optional, character driven side stories. It gives developers a chance to explore the world beyond the main plot without rushing the core emotional beats.